msr imitates kragen-discuss
Dave Long
dave.long at bluewin.ch
Thu Oct 19 13:31:46 EDT 2006
That didn't take so long...
"Re: color holograms with macroscopic technology"
<http://lists.canonical.org/pipermail/kragen-discuss/2002-June/
000833.html>
> which leads me to wonder -- could one
> use the same technique instead of a
> heap? Modules could spread state in
> an address space; if there were any
> interference, they could re-place it
> (a spatial backoff, like Ethernet's
> temporal one).
"Samurai - Protecting Critical Heap Data in Unsafe Languages"
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1730#comment-21630
> Previous approaches to eliminating these errors attempt to eliminate
> all unsafe memory operations in a program. We present Samurai, a
> runtime system that allows programmers to selectively identify heap
> objects that are critical to correct execution of their program.
> Samurai supports operations to consistently read and update critical
> data and probabilistically guarantees that no other memory updates in
> the program will corrupt critical data. Samurai uses replication and
> randomization to provide these consistency guarantees.
...although it looks like they still lean on the crutch of an
allocator, rather than relying on randomization and using the back-off
scheme above.
-Dave
More information about the Kragen-discuss
mailing list